Consensus proposal for revised International Working Group 2023 response criteria for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes/myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are associated with variable clinical presentations and outcomes. The initial response criteria developed by the International Working Group (IWG) in 2000 have been used in clinical practice, clinical trials, regulatory reviews, and drug labels. Although the IWG criteria were revised in 2006 and 2018 (the latter focusing on lower-risk disease), limitations persist in their application to higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) and their ability to fully capture the clinical benefits of novel investigational drugs or serve as valid surrogates for longer-term clinical end points (eg, overall survival). Further, issues related to the ambiguity and practicality of some criteria lead to variability in interpretation and interobserver inconsistency in reporting results from the same sets of data. Thus, we convened an international panel of 36 MDS experts and used an established modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations for updated response criteria that would be more reflective of patient-centered and clinically relevant outcomes in HR-MDS. Among others, the IWG 2023 criteria include changes in the hemoglobin threshold for complete remission (CR), the introduction of CR with limited count recovery and CR with partial hematologic recovery as provisional response criteria, the elimination of marrow CR, and specific recommendations for the standardization of time-to-event end points and the derivation and reporting of responses. The updated criteria should lead to a better correlation between patient-centered outcomes and clinical trial results in an era of multiple emerging new agents with novel mechanisms of action.

Herramientas diagnostico-terapéuticas en síndromes mielodisplásicos en Uruguay / Diagnostic and therapeutic tools in myelodysplastic syndromes in Uruguay / Instrumentos diagnóstico-terapêuticos nas síndromes mielodisplásicas no Uruguai

Los Síndromes Mielodisplásicos (SMD) son un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades mieloides. Esta heterogeneidad en la presentación clínica complejiza el diagnóstico requiriendo diversos estudios complementarios. El tratamiento debe ser individualizado y adaptado al riesgo, desde terapias de soporte hasta intervenciones de alto costo. Para conocer la accesibilidad a las herramientas diagnóstico y terapéuticas se realizó una encuesta online dirigida a los hematólogos que asisten pacientes con SMD en Uruguay en 2016 y 2019. Las encuestas fueron respondidas por 32.5% y 26.6% de los miembros de la Sociedad de Hematología del Uruguay. Más del 90% tienen acceso a estudios histológicos, citogenéticos, FISH y citometría de flujo. La posibilidad de realizar paneles de secuenciación masiva se encuentra restringida a menos de 10% derivando la muestra al exterior, siendo mayor en 2019 en comparación a 2016. Los sistemas de estratificación de riesgo más utilizados son el sistema internacional de puntuación de riesgo (IPSS) y su versión revisada (IPSS-R). La disponibilidad de tratamientos de soporte (transfusiones, eritropoyetina y G-CSF), de azacitidina y del trasplante alogénico de precursores hematopoyéticos es amplia. Existió un aumento en indicación de azacitidina en 2019 con respecto a 2016. Sin embargo, el acceso a decitabina, lenalidomida y fármacos quelantes de hierro es escaso y no se cuenta con ensayos clínicos donde incluir pacientes que fallan o no responden a los tratamientos convencionales. La presente encuesta, realizada en dos períodos, describe la realidad y su evolución en nuestro país en cuanto a accesibilidad a herramientas diagnósticas y terapéuticas extrapolables a otras patologías oncohematológicas. Los datos recabados permitirán plantear estrategias tendientes a mejorar el abordaje diagnóstico-terapéutico de los pacientes con SMD en Uruguay.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) constitutes an heterogenous group of hematological malignancies. Reaching an accurate diagnosis, represents in an important number of cases, a major challenge that requires different diagnostic tools. In order to acknowledge the scope of access to those tools in our country, we performed a survey addressed to Uruguayan hematologists who care for MDS patients in their clinical practice. The survey was carried out in 2016 and 2019 among Uruguayan Hematology Society members. Response rate was 32.5% and 26.6% respectively. Access to bone marrow biopsy, cytogenetics, FISH and flow cytometry was accessible to more than 90% of physicians. Less than 10% of respondents were able to request next generation sequencing (NGS) studies and in that case, they have to send them abroad. IPSS and R-IPSS were the most frequently used risk scores. Support treatment such as growth factors and transfusions are widely accessible. Azacytidine and allogenic transplant are available as well. However, access to decitabine, lenalidomide and iron chelating drugs is scarce and there are no clinical trials to include patients who fail or do not respond to conventional treatments. This survey, carried out in two periods, describes the reality and its evolution in our country in terms of accessibility to diagnostic and therapeutic tools that can be extrapolated to other oncohematological pathologies. We were able to get to know our country reality regarding diagnostic and therapeutic tools for MDS patients. This, would represent an important input in order to design health strategies aiming to improve clinical care for our patients.

As Síndromes Mielodisplásicas (SMD) são um grupo heterogêneo de doenças mielóides. Essa heterogeneidade na apresentação clínica torna o diagnóstico mais complexo, exigindo vários estudos complementares. O tratamento deve ser individualizado e adaptado ao risco, desde terapias de suporte até intervenções de alto custo. Para conhecer a acessibilidade de ferramentas diagnósticas e terapêuticas, foi realizada uma pesquisa online dirigida aos hematologistas que atendem pacientes com SMD no Uruguai em 2016 e 2019. As pesquisas foram respondidas por 32,5% e 26,6% dos membros da Sociedad de Hematologia do Uruguai. Mais de 90% têm acesso a estudos histológicos, citogenéticos, FISH e citometria de fluxo. A possibilidade de realização de painéis de sequenciamento massivo está restrita a menos de 10% provenientes da amostra no exterior, sendo maior em 2019 em relação a 2016. Os sistemas de estratificação de risco mais utilizados são o sistema internacional de pontuação de risco (IPSS) e sua versão revisada (IPSS -R). Tratamentos de suporte (transfusões, eritropoietina e G-CSF), azacitidina e transplante alogênico de células-tronco hematopoiéticas estão amplamente disponíveis. Houve aumento da indicação de azacitidina em 2019 em relação a 2016. No entanto, o acesso a decitabina, lenalidomida e quelantes de ferro é escasso e não há ensaios clínicos para incluir pacientes que falham ou não respondem aos tratamentos convencionais. Este inquérito, realizado em dois períodos, descreve a realidade e a sua evolução no nosso país em termos de acessibilidade a instrumentos diagnósticos e terapêuticos que podem ser extrapolados para outras patologias onco-hematológicas. Os dados coletados permitirão propor estratégias destinadas a melhorar a abordagem diagnóstico-terapêutica de pacientes com SMD no Uruguai.

Ruxolitinib in severe COVID-19: Results of a multicenter, prospective, single arm, open-label clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with COVID-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome

Introduction: COVID-19 morbimortality is mainly associated with development of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which has been related to an augmented immune response of the host with elevated circulating cytokines. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, single arm (compared with a historical control), add-on, experimental phase 2 study, ruxolitinib 5 mg BID was added to standard of care in COVID-19 patients. Main objective was to determine efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in patients with COVID-19-related SARS. Results: Even though we could not show a significant reduction of COVID-19 pneumonia patients requiring intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation (primary endpoint), a trend to a lower mortality rate in critical ill patients receiving ruxolitinib was reported. Administered ruxolitinib dose had to be increased according to protocol in 32% of patients, without additional toxicity. Conclusion: Side effects profile was manageable, and no direct organ injury was caused by the study drug. Ruxolitinib had a fast anti-inflammatory effect, and one-third of patients felt well immediately after starting treatment.

Introducción: La morbimortalidad por COVID-19 se asocia principalmente con el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SARS), relacionado con una respuesta inmunitaria aumentada del huésped con aumento de los niveles circulantes de citoquinas. Métodos: En este estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, de un solo brazo (en comparación con un control histórico), en fase 2, se agregó ruxolitinib 5 mg dos veces al día al estándar de tratamiento en pacientes con COVID-19. El objetivo principal fue determinar la eficacia y seguridad de ruxolitinib en pacientes con SARS relacionado con COVID-19. Resultados: aunque no fue posible demostrar una reducción significativa de la proporción de pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19 que requerían ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos y ventilación mecánica (criterio de valoración principal), se observó una tendencia a una menor tasa de mortalidad en los pacientes críticos que recibieron ruxolitinib. La dosis de ruxolitinib administrada tuvo que aumentarse de acuerdo con el protocolo en el 32% de los pacientes, sin toxicidad adicional. Conclusión: El perfil de efectos secundarios fue manejable y el fármaco en estudio no causó lesiones orgánicas directas. El ruxolitinib tuvo un efecto antiinflamatorio rápido y un tercio de los pacientes manifestó bienestar inmediatamente después de comenzar el tratamiento.

[Acquired paraneoplastic hemophilia secondary to Vater's ampulla adenocarcinoma]. / Hemofilia paraneoplásica adquirida secundaria a adenocarcinoma de la ampolla de Vater.

Acquired hemophilia A is an unusual bleeding disorder of autoimmune origin resulting in the formation of autoantibodies directed against coagulation factor VIII. These autoantibodies can act by partially or completely neutralizing the activation or function of the factor, or they can also accelerate its elimination from the circulation. The global incidence of the disease is 1.5 cases per million inhabitants per year. In nearly 50% of cases, an underlying disease that is presumed responsible to produce autoantibodies can be detected. We report a case with acquired hemophilia A, in a patient with Vater's ampulla adenocarcinoma.

La hemofilia adquirida A es un desorden hemorrágico inusual de origen autoinmune que resulta en la formación de autoanticuerpos dirigidos contra el factor VIII de la coagulación. Estos autoanticuerpos pueden actuar neutralizando parcial o completamente la activación o función del factor, o también pueden acelerar su eliminación de la circulación. La incidencia mundial de la enfermedad es de 1.5 casos por millón de habitantes por año. En cerca del 50% de los pacientes se puede detectar una enfermedad subyacente que se presume responsable de la producción de los autoanticuerpos. Se presenta el caso de un varón con hemofilia adquirida A, en contexto de adenocarcinoma de la ampolla de Vater.

Hemofilia paraneoplásica adquirida secundaria a adenocarcinoma de la ampolla de Vater / Acquired paraneoplastic hemophilia secondary to Vater's ampulla adenocarcinoma

Resumen La hemofilia adquirida A es un desorden hemorrágico inusual de origen autoinmune que resulta en la formación de autoanticuerpos dirigidos contra el factor VIII de la coagulación. Estos autoanticuer pos pueden actuar neutralizando parcial o completamente la activación o función del factor, o también pueden acelerar su eliminación de la circulación. La incidencia mundial de la enfermedad es de 1.5 casos por millón de habitantes por año. En cerca del 50% de los pacientes se puede detectar una enfermedad subyacente que se presume responsable de la producción de los autoanticuerpos. Se presenta el caso de un varón con hemofilia adquirida A, en contexto de adenocarcinoma de la ampolla de Vater.

Abstract Acquired hemophilia A is an unusual bleeding disorder of autoimmune origin resulting in the formation of autoantibodies directed against coagulation factor VIII. These autoantibodies can act by partially or completely neutralizing the activation or function of the factor, or they can also accelerate its elimination from the circulation. The global incidence of the disease is 1.5 cases per million inhabitants per year. In nearly 50% of cases, an underlying disease that is presumed responsible to produce autoantibodies can be detected. We report a case with acquired hemophilia A, in a patient with Vater's ampulla adenocarcinoma.

[Preferences and limitations of hematologists to address the complexity of myelodysplastic syndromes]. / Preferencias y limitaciones de los hematólogos para afrontar la complejidad de los síndromes mielodisplásicos.

Argentina is a country characterized by a heterogeneous distribution of its population, its economic resources and, consequently, access to health services, which could affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Based on the increasing complexity to arrive at the diagnosis, estimate the risk and indicate an adequate treatment, we have conducted a survey of twenty-three questions to evaluate patterns of clinical practice. The questionnaire was distributed among 850 hematologists registered at the XXII Argentine Congress of Hematology, and 195 (22.9%) were answered; 40.0% report that < 75% of their patients access the karyotype, bone marrow histology and flow cytometry. This access decreases significantly due to low health coverage (OR 6.3), in the adult population (OR 3.8), when the cytogenetic study is derived (OR 3.2) and outside the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). The respondents avoid oncological terminologies (77.0%) when introducing the diagnosis and use the international prediction system or its review (74.2%) to stage risk. However, they prioritize age when selecting treatment and pediatricians preferentially recommend the transplantation of hematopoietic precursors. Most of the haematologists have prescribed the recommended treatments, whose suspensions were related to lack of response (62.7%), with reduced participation in clinical trials (8.9%). Therefore, they report heterogeneity in the access to complementary diagnostic tools with differences at the time of indicating a treatment, depending on the age of their patients without apparent limitations in their prescription.

La Argentina es un país caracterizado por una distribución heterogénea de su población, de sus recursos económicos y, consiguientemente, del acceso a los servicios de salud, lo cual podría afectar el diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes con síndromes mielodisplásicos. Basados en la complejidad creciente para arribar al diagnóstico, estimar el riesgo e indicar un tratamiento adecuado, hemos conducido una encuesta de veintitrés preguntas para evaluar patrones de práctica clínica. El cuestionario se distribuyó entre los 850 hematólogos argentinos inscriptos al XXII Congreso Argentino de Hematología y 195 (22.9%) fueron contestados. El 40.0% refieren que < 75% de sus pacientes acceden al cariotipo, histología de la médula ósea y citometría de flujo. Este acceso disminuye significativamente por una baja cobertura sanitaria (OR 6.3), en población adulta (OR 3.8), al derivar el estudio citogenético (OR 3.2) y fuera del área metropolitana de Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). Los encuestados evitan terminologías oncológicas (77.0%) al introducir el diagnóstico y utilizan el sistema internacional de predicción o su revisión (74.2%) para estadificar riesgo. Sin embargo, éstos priorizan la edad al seleccionar tratamiento y los pediatras indican preferentemente el trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos. La mayoría de los hematólogos ha prescripto los tratamientos recomendados, cuyas suspensiones se relacionaron con falta de respuesta (62.7%), con participación reducida en ensayos clínicos (8.9%). Por ende, refieren heterogeneidad en el acceso a las herramientas diagnósticas complementarias con diferencias al momento de indicar un tratamiento, dependiendo de la edad de sus pacientes, sin limitaciones aparentes en su prescripción.

Preferencias y limitaciones de los hematólogos para afrontar la complejidad de los síndromes mielodisplásicos / Preferences and limitations of hematologists to address the complexity of myelodysplastic syndromes

La Argentina es un país caracterizado por una distribución heterogénea de su población, de sus recursos económicos y, consiguientemente, del acceso a los servicios de salud, lo cual podría afectar el diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes con síndromes mielodisplásicos. Basados en la complejidad creciente para arribar al diagnóstico, estimar el riesgo e indicar un tratamiento adecuado, hemos conducido una encuesta de veintitrés preguntas para evaluar patrones de práctica clínica. El cuestionario se distribuyó entre los 850 hematólogos argentinos inscriptos al XXII Congreso Argentino de Hematología y 195 (22.9%) fueron contestados. El 40.0% refieren que < 75% de sus pacientes acceden al cariotipo, histología de la médula ósea y citometría de flujo. Este acceso disminuye significativamente por una baja cobertura sanitaria (OR 6.3), en población adulta (OR 3.8), al derivar el estudio citogenético (OR 3.2) y fuera del área metropolitana de Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). Los encuestados evitan terminologías oncológicas (77.0%) al introducir el diagnóstico y utilizan el sistema internacional de predicción o su revisión (74.2%) para estadificar riesgo. Sin embargo, éstos priorizan la edad al seleccionar tratamiento y los pediatras indican preferentemente el trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos. La mayoría de los hematólogos ha prescripto los tratamientos recomendados, cuyas suspensiones se relacionaron con falta de respuesta (62.7%), con participación reducida en ensayos clínicos (8.9%). Por ende, refieren heterogeneidad en el acceso a las herramientas diagnósticas complementarias con diferencias al momento de indicar un tratamiento, dependiendo de la edad de sus pacientes, sin limitaciones aparentes en su prescripción.

Argentina is a country characterized by a heterogeneous distribution of its population, its economic resources and, consequently, access to health services, which could affect the diagnosis and treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Based on the increasing complexity to arrive at the diagnosis, estimate the risk and indicate an adequate treatment, we have conducted a survey of twenty-three questions to evaluate patterns of clinical practice. The questionnaire was distributed among 850 hematologists registered at the XXII Argentine Congress of Hematology, and 195 (22.9%) were answered; 40.0% report that < 75% of their patients access the karyotype, bone marrow histology and flow cytometry. This access decreases significantly due to low health coverage (OR 6.3), in the adult population (OR 3.8), when the cytogenetic study is derived (OR 3.2) and outside the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires (OR 2.4). The respondents avoid oncological terminologies (77.0%) when introducing the diagnosis and use the international prediction system or its review (74.2%) to stage risk. However, they prioritize age when selecting treatment and pediatricians preferentially recommend the transplantation of hematopoietic precursors. Most of the haematologists have prescribed the recommended treatments, whose suspensions were related to lack of response (62.7%), with reduced participation in clinical trials (8.9%). Therefore, they report heterogeneity in the access to complementary diagnostic tools with differences at the time of indicating a treatment, depending on the age of their patients without apparent limitations in their prescription.

Decitabine in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Argentinian/South Korean multi-institutional clinical experience.

This multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of decitabine in patients from Argentina and South Korea with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Of 106 patients who received decitabine 20 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 h once daily for 5 days in 4-week cycles, 99 patients were evaluable after receiving at least two cycles. The overall improvement rate was 35% (19% complete response +4% marrow complete response +4% partial response +8% hematologic improvement). Overall survival at 2 years was 71%. Treatment-related adverse events included febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and bleeding, asthenia, fatigue, and eosinophilia. After complete response (CR), three patients received an allogeneic stem cell transplant. Four patients who relapsed after CR responded to decitabine retreatment. Acute myelogenous leukemia developed during follow-up in 21% of patients. Decitabine in a 5-day outpatient administration schedule was effective and well tolerated in typical clinical practice settings in South America and Asia.

Improvement in hematological, visceral, and skeletal manifestations of Gaucher disease type 1 with oral eliglustat tartrate (Genz-112638) treatment: 2-year results of a phase 2 study.

Eliglustat tartrate is an investigational oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease type 1 that is pharmacologically distinct from intravenous enzyme replacement therapy. Eliglustat tartrate improved clinical manifestations in patients who received 50 or 100 mg twice daily for 1 year during an open-label phase 2 study (Blood. 2010;116(6):893-899). We report further improvements after 2 years of treatment in 20 patients (11 females, 9 males; mean age, 33 years) with baseline splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia and/or anemia. Statistically significant (P < .001) percentage improvements from baseline occurred in platelet count (mean ± SD, 81% ± 56%), hemoglobin level (20% ± 15%), spleen volume (-52% ± 11%), and liver volume (-24% ± 13%). Mean platelet count increased ∼ 50 000/mm(3). Mean hemoglobin level increased 2.1 g/dL overall and 3.1 g/dL in 10 patients with baseline anemia. Organ volume reductions were greatest in patients with severe baseline organomegaly. Seventeen (85%) patients met established therapeutic goals for ≥ 3 of the 4 parameters. Lumbar spine bone mineral density increased 7.8% ± 10.6% (P = .01) and T-score 0.6 ± 0.8 (P = .012), with major gains in osteoporotic and osteopenic patients. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment showed that bone marrow infiltration by Gaucher cells was decreased (8/18 patients) or stable (10/18 patients). No safety-related trends emerged during 2 years of treatment. This multisite, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00358150.

A phase 2 study of eliglustat tartrate (Genz-112638), an oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease type 1.

Eliglustat tartrate (Genz-112638), a specific inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, is under development as an oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1). A multinational, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study of 26 GD1 patients (16 female, 10 male; mean age, 34 years) evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eliglustat tartrate administered twice daily by mouth at 50- or 100-mg doses based on plasma drug concentrations. Entry criteria required splenomegaly with thrombocytopenia and/or anemia. The composite primary efficacy end point required improvement after 52 weeks in at least 2 of these 3 disease manifestations and was met by 77% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 58%-89%) of all patients and 91% (95% CI = 72%-98%) of the 22 patients completing 52 weeks. Statistically significant improvements occurred in mean hemoglobin level (1.62 g/dL; 95% CI =1.05-2.18 g/dL), platelet count (40.3%; 95% CI = 23.7-57.0 g/dL), spleen volume (-38.5%; 95% CI = -43.5%--33.5%), liver volume (-17.0%; 95% CI = -21.6%-12.3%), and lumbar spine bone mineral density (0.31 Z-score; 95% CI = 0.09-0.53). Elevated biomarkers (chitotriosidase; chemokine CCL18; angiotensin-converting enzyme; tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase) decreased by 35% to 50%. Plasma glucosylceramide and ganglioside GM3 normalized. Eliglustat tartrate was well tolerated: 7 mild, transient adverse events in 6 patients were considered treatment-related. Individual pharmacokinetics varied; mean time to maximal observed concentration was 2.3 hours and mean half-life was 6.8 hours. Eliglustat tartrate appears to be a promising oral treatment for GD1.